🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and families are observing with great interest to see if this approach will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a rising chorus of nations are exploring similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister declaring that mobile devices and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be formalized in the coming year.
• Norway is set to implement a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to protect the young from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital wallet to authenticate the identity and age of social media account holders. The media minister have indicated that an Australia-style ban is "one of the measures under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has called on lawmakers to approve a law increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a similar move, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised parents to prevent their youngsters from social media until 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has passed a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s except if parental consent is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "supported by strong evidence".

Last year, interest gathered behind a bill to enact limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration vowed to further research the matter.

Advocacy groups have expressed concerns. A prominent charity set up by the loved ones of a young person who took her own life after being exposed to disturbing social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could create a "cliff edge" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, regulation is primarily occurring at the state government level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah demands adult approval for minors to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access needing parental permission.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws demanding parental consent for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and proposals from certain figures to follow this path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Apart from these regions, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "could backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "vital connection" for isolated young people and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to invest in child safeguards.

While this worldwide conversation evolves, the actions of Australia and others indicate that states around the world are less and less willing to wait for the industry to act voluntarily.