🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves vulnerable to coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should stop but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

An absence of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Several families want additional coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the time for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager confirmed the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.